Este post:
http://desarrollo-web.blogspot.com/2...r-visitas.html
y este paper:
http://www.highrankings.com/issue142.htm#guest
Concretamente lo que dice en estos parrafos:
"Permanent Redirect Not Always the Best Choice
Conventional wisdom will tell you to redirect the old domain to the
new domain using a 301 "permanently moved" response. This tells the
engines that the old URL is no longer going to be used and the new one
is the correct one, so that they can update their index with the
appropriate URL.
However, if you follow this usually accurate advice, you'll find the
new pages do not automatically assume the positions of the old ones in
Google...they will remain off the chart. Even though you are telling
Google that this site is exactly the same as the old one, the aging
filter will still apply. This doesn't seem like the best strategy, as
your site will remain in oblivion until it ages properly.
Temporary Redirect is the Way to Go
By using a 302 "temporarily moved" response instead of a 301, the
original URL will remain in Google's index, and maintain its position
as if the page were still there. However, visitors who click on the
link will be brought to your new URL, exactly where you want them to
be. It's the best of both worlds -- you retain your rankings during
that interim aging period, but visitors are redirected to the updated
and correct domain.
Once the 302-redirect is in place, it's imperative to start a linking
campaign for the new site. You'll need links pointing to it in order
for it to be ready to rank highly when it's released from the aging
filter. When you notice the new domain starting to show up in the
rankings (anywhere from 6-12 months, typically) then it's time to
contact your previous linking partners to update their links from the
old domain to the new one."
gracias por vuestras respuestas... es un tema muy relevante para mi y supongo que os interesará al menos leerlo. Además el paper no esta en cualquier sitio (highrankings) por lo que me ha llamado bastante la atencion...
